midpage

People v. BendellPeople v. Bendell

New York Court of Appeals
Feb 13, 1986
Versions:67 N.Y.2d 724
490 N.E.2d 858
499 N.Y.S.2d 939
1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16647

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]). We agree with the dissenting Justices below (111 AD2d 87, 89-91) that any error of the prosecutor, in referring to his pretrial involvement in the case, was harmless (see, People v Paperno, 54 NY2d 294; People v Ortiz, 54 NY2d 288) and that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant’s character witnesses was proper (see, People v Kuss, 32 NY2d 436). There is no ground, therefore, for holding that defendant has been deprived of his fundamental right to a fair trial by the prosecutor’s conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bendell
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 13, 1986
Citations: 67 N.Y.2d 724; 490 N.E.2d 858; 499 N.Y.S.2d 939; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16647
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In