People v. BellPeople v. Bell
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for assault in the second degree, driving while intoxicated and related misdemeanors and traffic infractions defendant argues, inter alia, that the verdict was not supported by the evidence and that he was denied the right to counsel of his choice. All charges arose from an automobile accident in which defendant’s car crossed a double yellow line and struck another car head on.
The defendant was convicted of "recklessly causing] serious physical injury to another person by means of a * * * dangerous instrument” (Penal Law § 120.05 [4]). Under the circumstances here, defendant’s car was used as dangerous instrument (Penal Law § 10.00 [13], [14]; People v France,
The evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3], [5]; see, People v Cruz,