OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed. Appeals in criminal cases are
*839
strictly limited to those authorized by statute
(see People v De Jesus,
Chapter 643 of the Laws of 2005, the unconsolidated law at issue, provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken as of right in accordance with applicable provisions of the criminal procedure law: (a) from an order denying resentencing” (L 2005, ch 643, § 1). We reject defendant’s argument that chapter 643 authorizes not only an appeal as of right to the intermediate appellate court, but also an appeal to this Court by permission pursuant to CPL 450.90. The Legislature failed to mention CPL 450.90 in chapter 643 of the Laws of 2005. Moreover, the Legislature did not amend the language of CPL 450.10 or CPL 450.15 to provide in those sections for appeals to the intermediate appellate court from orders denying applications for resentencing, so as to bring such orders within the scope of CPL 450.90 (1).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Cipakick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
Appeal dismissed in a memorandum.
Notes
An order denying an application for resentencing is not equivalent to an appealable sentence (see
De Jesus,
