People v. BatesPeople v. Bates
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, assault in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child. We reject the contention of defendant that the proof at trial is insufficient to corroborate his confession (see, CPL 60.50). The physician who examined the victim, defendant’s 21/2-year-old daughter, testified that she found conditions unusual in a child of that age and consistent with penile penetration. That proof sufficiently corroborates the admission of defendant that he engaged in sexual intercourse with his daughter (see, People v Collins,
We further conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley,
Given the nature of the crime, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). The indeterminate sentence of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years imposed for assault in the second degree, however, is illegal. The maximum sentence for that offense committed before October 1, 1995 is 21/s to 7 years (see, Penal Law § 70.02 [2], [4]; § 70.00 [2] [d]), and we therefore vacate the sentence imposed for assault in the second degree and resentence defendant on that count to an indeterminate term of incarceration having a maximum term of 7 years and minimum term of 21/3 years to run concurrently to the sentence imposed for rape in the first degree. (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sir-kin, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.