People v. BargerPeople v. Barger
- Reporters:
- ,
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the County Court properly admitted at trial evidence of the defendant‘s refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test, since there was sufficient evidence before the County Court to support the conclusion that the defendant was twice given clear and unequivocal warnings of the effect of his refusal to submit to the blood alcohol test, and that he persisted in his refusal to take it (see
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see