History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Barber
26 N.Y.S. 417
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1893
Check Treatment
HERRICK, J.

It seems to me that the indictment sets forth an offense under section 218 of the Penal Code.1 The evidence shows that the defendant was committing an offense under section 448 of the Penal Code. The person who made the arrest, and whom the defendant assaulted, was a constable, and the defendant’s offense was committed in his presence. Under section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a constable had authority to *418arrest him for such offense without a warrant. The judgment should therefore be affirmed. I see no occasion for an opinion. All concur.

Pen. Code, § 218, provides as follows: “A person who, under circumstances not amounting to the crime specified in the last section, [assault in the first degree,] * * * (5) assaults another with intent to commit a felony, or' to prevent or resist the execution of any lawful process or mandate of any court or officer, or the lawful apprehension or detention of himself, or of another person, is guilty of assault in the second degree.”

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Barber
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 6, 1893
Citation: 26 N.Y.S. 417
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.