History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Bangeneaur
40 Cal. 613
Cal.
1871
Check Treatment
Temple, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Rhodes, C. J., 'Wallace, J., and Crockett, J., concurring:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary. At the time he was called up for sentence, for some reason *614which, does not appear, the District Attorney asked that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted. The motion was sustained against the objection of the defendant, who, feeling aggrieved, has appealed to this Court from the order.

The statute only authorizes the Court to grant a new trial upon application of the defendant.

The order is, therefore, erroneous and must be reversed. So ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Bangeneaur
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1871
Citation: 40 Cal. 613
Docket Number: No 2,651
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.