History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Baker
19 N.Y.2d 982
NY
1967
Check Treatment

In each action: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Breitel. Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the imposition of consecutive sentences for the crimes of unlawful entry and petit larceny arising out of a single transaction violated section 1938 of the Penal Law.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Baker
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 1, 1967
Citation: 19 N.Y.2d 982
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.