People v. ArnoldPeople v. Arnold
We are not persuaded by defendant‘s sole contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. None of the factors set forth by defendant, including his youth, lack of significant criminal history and childhood hardships, mitigate the violent nature of his conduct, which included the repeated stabbing of an unarmed victim (see People v Townsley, 240 AD2d 955, 959 [1997], lvs denied 90 NY2d 1014, 1015 [1997]; People v Baker, 225 AD2d 949, 950 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 844 [1996]). Given that defendant‘s sentence was significantly more lenient than the maximum authorized for his crimes (see
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.