People v. AntonelliPeople v. Antonelli
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered May 29, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not advance this contention at trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray,
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari,
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval,