THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v JASON LOVETT, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
June 13, 2005
18 A.D.3d 577, 794 N.Y.S.2d 655
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly ruled after a Sirois hearing (see Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, 92 AD2d 405 [1983]) that he could not introduce prior grand jury testimony at trial to impeach the complainant’s subsequent grand jury testimony is without merit (see People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359, 366 [1995]; People v Pace, 300 AD2d 1071, 1072 [2002]; People v Sime, 254 AD2d 183, 184 [1998]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
SANTUCCI, J.P.
CRANE, MASTRO and SPOLZINO, JJ.
