THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v CESAR ALVAREZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division, First Department
864 NYS2d 410
Since the court‘s reference to numerical majorities did not result in a constitutionally deficient jury instruction, counsel‘s failure to object to that reference did not deprive defendant of
The court‘s adverse inference charge concerning the prosecution‘s loss or destruction of certain notes of a witness interview was sufficient to prevent any prejudice to defendant (see People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940 [1988]), and the court properly exercised its discretion in declining to include the additional language requested by defendant.
The record does not establish that defendant‘s sentence was based on any improper criteria, and we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Acosta, JJ.
