People v. AlvaradoPeople v. Alvarado
Although the court should have permitted defendant to introduce the original civilian complainant‘s hospital records demonstrating his alleged intoxication into evidence, the error was harmless under the standards for constitutional or nonconstitutional error (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). There was overwhelming evidence that defendant assaulted a police officer with intent to prevent him from performing a lawful duty (see
Defendant waived his present challenge to the constitutional
Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Nardelli and Moskowitz, JJ.