People v. AlstonPeople v. Alston
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury‘s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The People‘s case featured reliable identification testimony by multiple witnesses.
At a Sirois hearing (Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, 92 AD2d 405 [1983]), the People proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendant caused a witness‘s unavailability. A chain of circumstantial evidence led to the inescapable conclusion that defendant was responsible for threatening the witness (see People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359, 369-372 [1995]). The court properly admitted the grand jury testimony of the intimidated witness, as well as other statements made by her that bore sufficient indicia of reliability (see People v Cotto, 92 NY2d 68, 77-78 [1998]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.