People v. AllenPeople v. Allen
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (
Defendant further contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based upon the testimony of a police officer that defendant was driving a vehicle previously “involved in a couple robberies.” We reject that contention. When defense counsel objected to that testimony, the court sustained the objection and instructed the jury to disregard the testimony. It is well settled that “the jury is presumed to have followed” that curative instruction (People v Woods, 60 AD3d 1493, 1494 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 922 [2009]; see People v Cruz, 272 AD2d 922, 923 [2000], affd 96 NY2d 857 [2001]), and we thus conclude that any prejudice resulting from that single statement by the police officer was thereby alleviated (see People v Young, 55 AD3d 1234, 1236 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 901 [2008]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers, Pine and Gorski, JJ.