9562 | Mich. Ct. App. | Feb 25, 1971
PEOPLE
v.
ALLEN
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Gerald Curtis, for defendant on appeal.
Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of murder in the second degree, contrary to *184 MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549), and was sentenced to a 20 to 40 year prison term. His appeal as of right from that conviction and sentence is met by a motion to affirm. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).
Defendant argues on appeal that the court should not have accepted his guilty plea because he did not admit in his own words the existence of all of the elements of the crime. It is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed, on which decision of the cause depends, is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission. A proper plea of guilty does not require that defendant establish each and every element of the offense by his testimony. People v. Reid (1970), 27 Mich. App. 415" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1970-10-27" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-reid-2150500?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2150500">27 Mich. App. 415; People v. Donald T. Moore (1970), 21 Mich. App. 150" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1970-01-27" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-donald-t-moore-1605321?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1605321">21 Mich. App. 150; People v. Bartlett (1969), 17 Mich. App. 205" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-05-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/people-v-bartlett-1626527?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1626527">17 Mich. App. 205. A review of the record in this case establishes that there was a substantial factual basis for defendant's plea.
Motion to affirm is granted.