History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Ali
233 A.D.2d 517
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.), imposed August 11, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the procedure utilized by the court in determining the amount of restitution; therefore, his challenge on appeal is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281). In any event, since the defendant agreed at his plea allocution to the amount of restitution imposed by the court, the court did not err in imposing restitution without conducting a hearing (see, People v Jackson, 201 AD2d 504; see also, People v Lugo, 191 AD2d 648; People v Moore, 176 AD2d 968). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Ali
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 25, 1996
Citation: 233 A.D.2d 517
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.