History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Adams
1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15404
NY
1987
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant complains that the trial court erred in charging the jury with respect to circumstantial evidence that some of the facts could be proved with less assurance than others. Although the language isolated by defendant was one of the bases for reversal in People v Ford (66 NY2d 428, 443), the charge as a whole adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards (People v Ford, supra).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for our review.

*807 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Adams
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 17, 1987
Citation: 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15404
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In