44 A.D.3d 1020
N.Y. App. Div.
2007

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v CURTIS R. ADAMS, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

845 NYS2d 375

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated July 5, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level as shown on the risk assessment instrument. The defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances warranting such a departure. In fact, his contention that his ill health would militate against his reoffending is belied by his own actions in committing a sexual offense at a time when his kidneys allegedly had already failed (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404, 405-406 [2005]; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364 [2006]; cf. People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515, 516 [2006]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the People‘s contentions. Rivera, J.P., Krausman, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.