History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Acosta
10 Cal. 195
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

Indictment and conviction for murder in the first degree.

We have carefully examined the voluminous testimony in the record, and we can see no substantial contradiction in the evidence of the different witnesses. Taking the testimony for the prosecution alone, and leaving out that of the defence, and we must say that we can not see any ground upon which the verdict could stand. The principles laid down by us in the case of The People v. Payne, (8 Cal. Rep., 841,) are quite applicable to the facts of the present case. It is with reluctance that we disturb the verdict of a jury in any case; but, from the testimony, as stated in the record, it seems most manifest that the verdict must have been given under a state of great excitement, preventing a fair and just trial. The Court below should have granted a new trial.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Acosta
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 10 Cal. 195
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.