People v. AcevedoPeople v. Acevedo
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The element of serious physical injury was satisfied by evidence objectively supporting the jury‘s finding that the knife wound inflicted by defendant caused serious and protracted disfigurement, consisting of a scar on the victim‘s neck (see People v McKinnon, 15 NY3d 311, 315-316 [2010]). Photographs taken shortly before trial, the jury‘s view of the scar, medical testimony, testimony from the victim and reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence support the conclusion that the scar was prominent and distressing, and that it remained so at the time of trial, years