History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. . Robinson
143 N.E. 745
NY
1924
Check Treatment

We may not consider the question argued before us as to whether the book for the selling of which the defendant was convicted was obscene, lewd, lascivous, filthy, indecent or disgusting. By failing to move at the close of the evidence to dismiss the proceeding the defendant conceded that there was a question of fact to be determined by the court. (People v. Bresler,218 N.Y. 567; People v. Bellavicini, 218 N.Y. 717.) The rulings of the trial court upon the exclusion of evidence were proper.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed. *Page 568

Case Details

Case Name: People v. . Robinson
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 18, 1924
Citation: 143 N.E. 745
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.