| NY | Jun 15, 1909

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ.; CULLEN, Ch. J., and HAIGHT, J., dissent upon the ground that the fact that the prohibition of the sale of skim milk in New York and Kings counties is unqualified, while the legislature recognizes such milk as an article fit for sale in the other counties of the state, renders this provision of the statute invalid.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.