History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. . Diemer
111 N.E. 1094
NY
1916
Check Treatment

Judgment modified by striking therefrom the amount allowed for interest upon the recognizances from the date of forfeiture, and as modified affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of HISCOCK, J., in People v. Parisi (217 N.Y. 24).

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. *Page 604

Case Details

Case Name: People v. . Diemer
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 18, 1916
Citation: 111 N.E. 1094
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.