People ex rel. Shaffer v. KuhlmannPeople ex rel. Shaffer v. Kuhlmann
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered July 30, 1990 in Ulster County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70.
Additionally, the facts alleged in the petition could have been asserted in a CPL article 440 motion or on direct appeal and habeas corpus is thus not an appropriate remedy (see, People ex rel. Rosado v Miles,
Finally, as to petitioner’s contention that he was not afforded an evidentiary hearing, none is required where there are no triable issues of fact and a summary determination can be made upon the pleadings. Petitioner’s presence, therefore, was not required before Supreme Court (see, People ex rel. Robertson v New York State Div. of Parole,
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.