History
  • No items yet
midpage
People ex rel. Roides v. Smith
67 N.Y.2d 899
NY
1986
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In these 15 separate article 78 proceedings challenging prison disciplinary board determinations that respondents, then inmates at Attica Correctional Facility, violated institutional rules, respondents contend that the inmate behavior rules were not filed with the Secretary of State at the time of the alleged violations, that the rules were therefore ineffective, and that the findings of guilt must for that reason be annulled. Appellant does not dispute that the rules were unfiled. In this situation, the rules were of no effect whatever, and findings of guilt based on them must be vacated in accordance with Matter of Jones v Smith (64 NY2d 1003). While respondents first urge this argument on appeal, appellant suggests no factual showing or legal counterstep that might have been made if the argument had been tendered below.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone, JJ., concur; Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), orders affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People ex rel. Roides v. Smith
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 1, 1986
Citation: 67 N.Y.2d 899
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.