34 N.Y.S. 388 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1895
Lead Opinion
In May, 1893, the legislature passed an act entitled “An act providing for ascertaining and paying the amount of damages to lands and buildings suffered by reason of changes of grades of streets or avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Law’s of 1887, providing for the depression of railroad tracks in the Twenty-Third and Twenty-Fourth wards in the city of New York or otherwise.” By the first section of this act certain property owners were entitled to recover and prove certain damages as in said act provided. By the second section, within 30 days after its passage, the mayor of the city of New York was authorized and directed to appoint three commissioners for the purpose of estimating such loss and damage. The duties and powers of the commissioners were then provided for in the act. On the 8th day of May, 1893, the mayor appointed Daniel Lord, James M. Varnum, and James A. Deering as commissioners “to ascertain and pay the amount of damages to lands and buildings suffered by reason of the changes of grades of streets or avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887 or otherwise.” On the same day the said commissioners accepted said appointment, and each subscribed and took the oath required by said act of 1893 (chapter 537, Laws 1893). On the 7th of June, 1893, one Rachel Purdy filed her claim
It does not seem to be necessary to consider all the numerous objections which are raised to the constitutionality of the laws as they appear upon the statute book, the mistakes contained therein in their references to statutes, or the various omissions in the proceedings. It must be conceded, however, that in the amendment of chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893 made by chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894, a new statute was substantially enacted; and that proceedings which had been taken prior to the passage of the act of 1894, and not completed, in order to be made the foundation of a claim against the city, must be shown to have complied with the provisions of the act of 1894. It seems also, in view of the nature of the acts, to have been necessary for the mayor to reappoint commissioners, for the reason that by the provisions of the law of 1894 additional powers were conferred upon the commissioners appointed under the act of 1893 to those which they had originally enjoyed. The act of 1894 enjoined additional duties upon the commissioners, looking to the assessment of future damages, which was not the province of the commissioners appointed under the act of 1893. Hence the act of 1894 provided that commissioners should be appointed under that act for that purpose as well as the other. This was the construction placed upon the act by the mayor in making the appointment which he did under the act of 1894. But, unfortunately, in the making of this appointment he did not follow the act of 1894, but varied the language of the previous appointments; and hence he did not appoint the commissioners to do the things for which he was authorized to appoint them under the act of 1894. This would seem to make his appointment fatally defective. The authority of the commissioners to act was necessarily derived from the appointment of the mayor, and the attempted appointment of commissioners under the act of 1894 seems to fail of effect because of the defective manner of its execution. This is an objection which seems to lie at the root of the whole of these proceedings. It is more than a mere clerical omission, and the additional powers cannot be attached to the appointment because the mayor had the authority to make an appointment of commissioners to do additional things. He appointed commissioners to ascertain the amount of damages to lands and buildings'suffered by reason of changes of grade of streets and avenues pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887. He did not appoint new commissioners to assess any damages which might be sustained in the future by reason of such change; neither did he appoint new commissioners to ascertain any damages which might have been sustained by reason of changes of grade arising
The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with costs.
PARKER, J., concurs.
Dissenting Opinion
I do not concur in the conclusion reached by the presiding justice as to the effect of the recital in the appointment of the commissioners. The facts bearing upon such appointment are stated in the affidavit of the comptroller, and áre as follows:
“That subsequently to the passage of the said act, on or about the 8th day of June, 1894, James A. Deering, one of the commissioners, appointed under the provisions of chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893, having theretofore, and on November 10, 1893, resigned as one of said commissioners, and Daniel P. Hays having been appointed a commissioner in his place and stead under the provisions of said chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893, and having duly qualified, on or about the 15th day of November, 1893, Thomas F. Gilroy, then mayor of the city of New York, under the provisions of chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894, on 8th June, 1894, appointed Daniel Lord, James M. Varnum, and Daniel P. Hays as commissioners ‘to ascertain and pay the amount of damages to lands and buildings suffered by reason of changes of grades of streets and avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887,’ and the said Daniel Lord, James M. Varnum, and Daniel P. Hays, and each of them, accepted the said appointment, and duly qualified as commissioners, under chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894, and thereafter entered upon the discharge of their duties as said commissioners.”
Here we have the statement that they “duly qualified as commissioners” under the Laws of 1894, and this is supplemented by evidence in the record that in the discharge of their duty they conformed to such law. Upon these facts, it seems to me, it would be giving too narrow and critical a construction to the language used in the appointment, which has reference to the law of 1887. This at best is but a mere recital, and should not be regarded as a limitation upon the powers of the commissioners. It was a very natural recital, for, as appears, such act of 1887 (chapter 721) was the original act which provided for ascertaining and paying the