People ex rel. Price v. WestPeople ex rel. Price v. West
Petitioner, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, commenced this
We affirm. Even assuming that petitioner is correct in his assertion that his conditional release date was miscalculated, he would not have been entitled to immediate release from prison and, therefore, habeas corpus relief is not the proper remedy and his petition was properly dismissed (see People ex rel. Vasquez v Filion, 22 AD3d 991, 992 [2005]; People ex rel. Buroughs v Travis, 273 AD2d 560, 560 [2000]; People ex rel. Wilson v Hanslmaier, 232 AD2d 702, 702 [1996]).
Although conversion to a
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
SPAIN, J.