33 Mich. 303 | Mich. | 1876
I. The order was appealable. Such an appeal was sustained in People v. Simonson, 10 Mich., 335.
II. The respondent’s appointment as receiver having
III. In so far as the respondent had expended the money of the company, which he had received in conducting the business, in the payment of expenses, and the salaries of employes for which the company would be holden, there being no objection urged to the allowance of these expenditures, it is proper he should be credited for them. But the charge for his own compensation was not a proper one to be allowed to come out of the fund thus collected.
Order affirmed, with costs. •