157 N.Y. 363 | NY | 1898
The only question it is necessary to determine in this case is whether the relator was entitled to the *365
exemption claimed. We think she was not. As the law stood when the assessments complained of were made, pension money or real property purchased with it was exempt from execution, and as this court held in Yates Co. Nat. Bank v. Carpenter (
This case was properly disposed of by the Appellate Division, and the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.
All concur, except GRAY, J., absent.
Order affirmed.