People ex rel. Cropper v. TaylorPeople ex rel. Cropper v. Taylor
A review of the petition reveals no issue that could not have been raised on direct appeal or in a collateral motion and, as such, his claims are not the proper subjects of this habeas corpus proceeding (see People ex rel. King v Bennett, 45 AD3d 1015, 1016 [2007]; People ex rel. Washington v Walsh, 43 AD3d 1217 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 816 [2007]). Moreover, inasmuch as petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release from prison even if his claims were successful, habeas corpus relief is unavailable here (see People ex rel. King v Bennett, supra; People ex rel. McDermott v Artus, 38 AD3d 957, 958 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 814 [2007]). Accordingly, we affirm.
Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.