History
  • No items yet
midpage
People Ex Rel. Choate v. . Barrett
121 N.Y. 678
| NY | 1890
|
Check Treatment

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur except EARL and FINCH, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that the misconduct of the appellant was not within "the immediate view and presence of the court," as stated in the Code of Civil Procedure.

Order affirmed. *Page 679

Case Details

Case Name: People Ex Rel. Choate v. . Barrett
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 9, 1890
Citation: 121 N.Y. 678
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.