History
  • No items yet
midpage
People ex rel. Chapman v. Pratt
15 Mich. 184
Mich.
1867
Check Treatment

This was an information in the nature of a quo warranto, to try the right to a public office. The case was sought to be heard upon a stipulation of facts, signed by the relator and defendant. It was held that as the Attorney General has control of the proceedings in such cases, that he alone is authorized to sign admissions of fact on the part of the people.

The case was continued as not in readiness for hearing.

Case Details

Case Name: People ex rel. Chapman v. Pratt
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 10, 1867
Citation: 15 Mich. 184
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.