35 Barb. 254 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1861
The difficulty with the relator’s case seems to be in the law itself, which gives the office, and designates the power which is to appoint and remove; and yet
In this view of the case, and following the principle of the case of The People v. Stout, (19 How. Pr. R. 171,) it would seem that’this cáse was correctly decided by the judge, at the circuit; and' that his decision should be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Clerke, Gould and Barnard, Justices.]