History
  • No items yet
midpage
Penrose v. Hart
1 Dall. 378
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1788
Check Treatment

But

Shippen, President,

said, that the practice had been otherwise; and he thought with great reason and propriety. He remembered to have heard of an old decision when Logan was Chief Justice, in which it was expressly settled, that money paid on account of a bond, should first be applied to discharge the interest due at the time of the payment, and the residue, if any, credited towards satisfaction of the principal. By this rule, the Gentlemen of the Bar had uniformly governed their calculations before the Revolution.

Case Details

Case Name: Penrose v. Hart
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Date Published: Dec 15, 1788
Citation: 1 Dall. 378
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.