History
  • No items yet
midpage
Penrod v. Prosecuting Attorney
59 Ohio St. 3d 602
Ohio
1991
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion rendered on April 3, 1990.

Case Details

Case Name: Penrod v. Prosecuting Attorney
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 24, 1991
Citation: 59 Ohio St. 3d 602
Docket Number: No. 90-999
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.