Pennsylvania R. v. Repine
272 F. 898 | 3rd Cir. | 1921
The substantial question argued at bar in this case was the instructions of the trial judge on the question whether the movement for repairs of the car with a defective coupler or brake was per se negligence. On closer examination we find no exception was taken at the trial to any part of the charge which bore on that matter. Consequently there is no foundation on which error can be assigned.
As none of the remaining assignments show error, the judgment below is affirmed.