History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pennock v. Crescent Pipe Line Co.
170 Pa. 372
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We find nothing in either of the assignments of error that would justify a reversal of the judgment. The rulings complained of are substantially correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pennock v. Crescent Pipe Line Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 7, 1895
Citation: 170 Pa. 372
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 157
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.