History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pennington v. Ziman
216 N.Y.S.2d 1
N.Y. App. Div.
1961
Check Treatment

Order entered on July 28, 1960, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 and subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, however, for the plaintiff-respondent to replead, if so advised, upon a showing by allegation of ultimate facts that a rescission of the agreement would accomplish some proper purpose, since equity will not suffer the making of a vain arder. (Cf. Sivakoff v. Sivakoff, 280 App. Div. 106, 108.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Pennington v. Ziman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 29, 1961
Citation: 216 N.Y.S.2d 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.