History
  • No items yet
midpage
Penland v. Golden
107 Cal. App. 2d 256
Cal. Ct. App.
1951
Check Treatment
HANSON, J. pro. tem.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Penland v. Golden
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 5, 1951
Citation: 107 Cal. App. 2d 256
Docket Number: Civ. No. 18357
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.