History
  • No items yet
midpage
Penfield v. Carpender
13 Johns. 350
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1816
Check Treatment
.Per-Curiam.

The admission of such testimony, was illegal and dangerous, and no subsequent caution or advice by the justice,-that the jury ought to. disregard'what the witnesses had sworn', can cure .the irregularity. • The law forbids such testimo;ny, hecaiise it mayAaiie anánfluence upon honest jurors, .who aré unconscious of the impressions which- they retain, inotwith^ standing;.the'effort of the court to obliterate-then}.' V. "

The tazation 'of costs .was alsoillegab

Judgmeht-reversedt-

Case Details

Case Name: Penfield v. Carpender
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1816
Citation: 13 Johns. 350
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.