History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pendleton v. State
543 So. 2d 459
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his sentence, alleging the trial court failed to comply with § 39.111(7), Florida Statutes, which requires the consideration of six criteria before the suitability or not of adult sanctions is determined. In its answer brief, appellee concedes that appellant is entitled to resentencing in accordance with § 39.111(7), Florida Statutes.

Pursuant to Rule 9.315(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we reverse. The sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentencing. On remand, the trial court shall afford appellant adequate notice and the opportunity to object to the imposition of court costs. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pendleton v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 25, 1989
Citation: 543 So. 2d 459
Docket Number: No. 88-2781
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.