Felix Pena, Appellant, v Goody‘s Spanish Food & More et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, New York
804 N.Y.S.2d 748
Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants met their initial burden of submitting evidence sufficient to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence in admissible form to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants breached their duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe manner (see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233 [1976]). Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.
