History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance
253 A.2d 183
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
1969
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit to recover against the defendant for a fire loss.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Mehler reported at 102 N. J. Super. 357 (Law Div. 1968). See also Staehle v. American Employers Ins. Co., 103 N. J. Super. 152 (App. Div. 1968).

Case Details

Case Name: Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: May 14, 1969
Citation: 253 A.2d 183
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.