Pellew v. GoldsteinPellew v. Goldstein
In
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant Jeffrey Klein committed dental malpractice in failing to take timely remedial measures after he lodged a root canal file in her mouth during the course of a dental procedure. At trial, the plaintiffs expert testified that the plaintiffs tooth was removed because of an infection. However, he failed to testify that the infection, which existed before the plaintiff visited Dr. Klein, became untreatable because of Dr. Klein’s alleged malpractice. Accordingly, there was no proof that any departure from accepted practice was a proximate cause of injury or damage (see, Lyons v McCauley,