27 Ga. App. 398 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1921
1. A charge that "the plaintiff was bound to lessen the damages, if he was damaged by the negligence of defendant, as far as possible, by the use of ordinary care and diligence,” was not error.' Civil Code (1910), § 4398. Nor was it error to refuse to charge as to specified acts which the plaintiff should have done to lessen the damage. Southern Ry. Co. v. Cunningham, 123 Ga. 90 (7) (50 S. E. 979).
2. “Assignments of error upon the admission of evidence, in order to avail the plaintiff in error here, must show not only in what respects the evidence admitted was objectionable, but that this objection was urged at the time of the admission of the evidence; and it is not
3. The jury passed upon the facts, the judge who tried the case did not see proper to interfere with their finding, and this court will not disturb it, as there is evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.