History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pelella v. Pelella
604 So. 2d 14
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pelella v. Pelella
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 11, 1992
Citation: 604 So. 2d 14
Docket Number: No. 91-2931
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.