Peleg v. Spitz
889 N.E.2d 1019
Ohio
2008
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Shoemaker v. Gindlesberger, 118 Ohio St.3d 226, 2008-Ohio-2012, 887 N.E.2d 1167.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.