History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peifer v. Landis
1 Watts 392
Pa.
1833
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There is no pretence of parol performance here, because there is no pretence of delivery of possession in pursuance of the contract; which is essential. The evidence, therefore, was properly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Peifer v. Landis
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 15, 1833
Citation: 1 Watts 392
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.