History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pegan v. Crawmer
79 Ohio St. 3d 155
| Ohio | 1997
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Pegan asserts in her sole proposition of law that attorney fees are not available as costs absent statutory authority or frivolous conduct on the part of the nonprevailing party. For the reasons that follow, we sustain Pegan’s proposition and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

First, in the absence of statutory authorization or a finding of conduct that amounts to bad faith, a prevailing party may not recover attorney fees. State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 171, 173, 661 N.E.2d 1049, 1051; Vance v. Roedersheimer (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 552, 556, 597 N.E.2d 153, 156. No statute authorizes attorney fees here, and neither this court nor the court of appeals determined that Pegan had acted in bad faith in instituting the habeas corpus action or her appeals.

Second, the reference to costs in our previous judgment entry referred only to the docket fee, not attorney fees. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 1218, 667 N.E.2d 1232; S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1); see, also, Muze v. Mayfield (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 173, 174-175, 573 N.E.2d 1078, 1079 (Unless specified by statute, “costs” do not include attorney fees.).

Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Case Details

Case Name: Pegan v. Crawmer
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 25, 1997
Citation: 79 Ohio St. 3d 155
Docket Number: No. 96-2852
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.